Functional Recovery During Conservative Rehabilitation in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Associated with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Case Report

Authors

  • Heny Agustien General Practitioner, Nurdin Hamzah General Hospital, Tanjung Jabung Timur, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Patrick William Gading Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nurdin Hamzah General Hospital, Tanjung Jabung Timur, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2026.11.4.987

Abstract

Background: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction and progressive neurological disability in adults, and patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury classified as AIS C may retain substantial potential for neurological and functional recovery. However, the role of structured conservative rehabilitation in patients who do not undergo surgery remains unclear. This case report aims to describe functional recovery following conservative rehabilitation in a patient with DCM.

Case presentation: This was a case report conducted at Nurdin Hamzah General Hospital, Tanjung Jabung Timur, Jambi, Indonesia. The subject was a 41-year-old man with progressive spastic tetraparesis, documented as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS C) cervical spinal cord injury associated with DCM, confirmed by cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showing multilevel spondyloarthrosis, degenerative disc disease, grade I retrolisthesis at C3–C6, and severe canal stenosis with cord compression at C5–C7. Data were obtained from medical records, including serial clinical examination and International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) motor scores. The patient declined surgical decompression and underwent structured outpatient conservative rehabilitation comprising progressive strengthening, functional training, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and short-wave diathermy (SWD). Neurological and functional recovery were evaluated descriptively based on serial motor scores and ambulation status.  

Results: Total ISNCSCI motor score improved from 40 to 90, with UEMS increasing from 30 to 50 and LEMS from 10 to 40. The patient achieved assisted ambulation by the third month and independent ambulation by the fourth month of rehabilitation.

Conclusion: Neurological and functional improvement was observed during structured conser­vative rehabilitation in patients with AIS C cervical spinal cord injury associated with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Keywords:

cervical myelopathy, cord injury, functional recovery, tetraparesis

Published

2026-10-10

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Functional Recovery During Conservative Rehabilitation in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Associated with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Case Report. (2026). Indonesian Journal of Medicine, 264-273. https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2026.11.4.987

References

Ahmed M, Hoque A, Zannat NA, Sadeque ABMZ, Khan TI. (2023). Comparison of the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and short wave diathermy on patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. TAJ J Teach Assoc. 36(2): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.3329/taj.v36i2.72492.

Badhiwala JH, Ahuja CS, Akbar MA, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, Furlan JC, Curt A, et al. (2020). Degenerative cervical myelopathy-update and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 16(2): 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0303-0.

Burns AS, Marino RJ, Flanders AE, Flett H. (2012). Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 109: 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6.

Curt A, van Hedel HJA, Klaus D, Dietz V, et al. (2008). Recovery from a spinal cord injury: significance of compensation, neural plasticity, and repair. J Neurotrauma. 25(6): 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2007.0468.

Davies BM, Mowforth OD, Smith EK, Kotter MRN. (2018). Degenerative cervical myelopathy. BMJ. 360: k186. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k186.

Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, Middleton JW, Wang JC. (2017). A clinical practice guideline for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy: introduction, rationale, and scope. Glob Spine J. 7(3): 21S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217703088.

Gibson J, Nouri A, Krueger B, Lakomkin N, Nasser R, Gimbel D, Cheng J. (2018). Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a clinical review. Yale J Biol Med. 91(1): 43–48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29599656/.

Hornby TG, Reisman DS, Ward IG, Scheets PL, Miller A, Haddad D, Fox EJ, et al. (2020). Clinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 44(1): 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000303.

Khorasanizadeh M, Yousefifard M, Eskian M, Lu Y, Chalangari M, Harrop JS, Jazayeri SB, et al. (2019). Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 30(5): 683–699. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.10.SPINE18802.

Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, Johansen M, et al. (2011). International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 34(6): 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1179/204577211X13207446293695.

Kirshblum S, Snider B, Eren F, Guest J. (2021). Characterizing natural recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 38(9): 1267–1284. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7473.

Nouri A, Cheng JS, Davies B, Kotter M, Schaller K, Tessitore E. (2020). Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a brief review of past perspectives, present developments, and future directions. J Clin Med. 9(2): 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020535.

Patathong T, Klaewkasikum K, Woratanarat P, Rattanasiri S, Anothaisintawee T, Woratanarat T, Thakkinstian A. (2023). The efficacy of gait rehabilitations for the treatment of incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 18(1): 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03459-w.

Rhee J, Tetreault LA, Chapman JR, Wilson JR, Smith JS, Martin AR, Dettori JR, et al. (2017). Nonoperative versus operative management for the treatment degenerative cervical myelopathy: an updated systematic review. Global Spine J. 7(3): 35S–41S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217703083.

Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Torre M, Molinari M. (2014). Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci. 8: 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00141.

Smith TO, Newton C, Farrell A, Boby J, Dove J, Dove F, Turner K, et al. (2025). Rehabilitation for degenerative cervical myelopathy: systematic review and scoping review of UK patient information. Spinal Cord. 63(9): 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01110-z.

Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Davies B, Nanna-Lohkamp L, Garwood P, Martin AR, Wilson JR, et al. (2022). Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a practical approach to diagnosis. Global Spine J. 12(8): 1881–1893. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211072847.

Tetreault LA, Rhee J, Prather H, Kwon BK, Wilson JR, Martin AR, Andersson IB, et al. (2017). Change in function, pain, and quality of life following structured nonoperative treatment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 7(3): 42S–52S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217700397.

Van Middendorp JJ, Hosman AJF, Donders ART, Pouw MH, Ditunno JF Jr, Curt A, Geurts ACH, et al. (2011). A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 377(9770): 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62276-3.

Yang Y, Tang Y, Qin H, Xu J. (2022). Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 60(5): 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00776-z.