Analysis of Risk Factors for Spinal Postural Disorders among Primary School Children

Authors

  • Zulfa Nadia Master's Program in Public Health, Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Annang Giri Moelyo Child Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Revi Gama Hatta Novika Master's Program in Public Health, Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Okid Parama Astirin Biology Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Dhoni Akbar Ghozali Anatomy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2026.11.3.950

Abstract

Background: Spinal postural disorders (kyphosis and lordosis) are increasingly prevalent among primary school children during the pre-pubertal phase when the spine remains structurally plastic. Evidence on screen time, physical activity, ergonomics, and nutritional status as simultaneous risk factors remains limited. This study examined their associations and identified the dominant determinant.

Subjects and Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted at an Integrated Islamic Primary School in Bekasi, Indonesia. A total of 240 students aged 9–12 years were enrolled by total sampling. The dependent variable was spinal postural disorder (kyphosis and/or lordosis), assessed by Occiput Wall Distance and Lumbar Wall Distance. Independent variables were screen time, physical activity, learning ergonomics, and nutritional status (BMI-for-age z-score, WHO AnthroPlus). Data were analysed by chi-square, Spearman correlation, multivariable logistic regression, and path analysis (SEM-ML).

Results: Prevalence of spinal postural disorders was 77.5% (kyphosis 55.8%; lordosis 63.3%; both simultaneously 44.2%). High screen time (>2 h/day) was found in 87.5% (mean 4.90±2.10 h/day), 61.7% were physically inactive, and 67.5% had abnormal nutritional status. Multivariable analysis identified BMI (aOR=1.12; 95% CI=1.04 to 1.21; p=0.002), high screen time (aOR=2.18; 95% CI=1.03 to 4.61; p=0.041), and physical inactivity (aOR=2.61; 95% CI=1.27 to 5.35; p=0.009) as independent predictors. Obesity showed the strongest bivariate association (OR=3.80; 95% CI=1.80 to 8.10; p<0.001). Path analysis confirmed BMI as the dominant determinant (total effect=0.38; CFI=1.00; RMSEA=0.00) and physical activity as a partial mediator of the BMI (Sobel z=2.34; p=0.019) and screen time (Sobel z=2.50; p=0.012) pathways.

Conclusion: Obesity, high screen time, and physical inactivity pose a high risk of spinal postural disorders. Weight management, screen time restriction, and increased physical activity are essential.

Keywords:

Spinal posture, kyphosis, lordosis, school children, sedentary behavior

Published

2026-06-10

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

References

American Academy of Pediatrics (2016). Media and young minds. Pediatrics. 138(5): e20162591. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2591.

Andriyani FD, Indra EN, Priambadha AA, Monnaatsie M (2024). Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of PAQ-C. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia. 20(1): 18–31. doi: 10.21831/jpji.v20i1.73750.

Bridger RS (2018). Introduction to Human Factors and Ergonomics. Fourth Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781351228442

Brzęk A, Dworrak T, Strauss M, Sanchis-Gomar F, Sabbah I, Dworrak B, Leischik R (2017). The weight of pupils’ schoolbags in early school age and its influence on body posture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 18(1): 117. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1462-z.

Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. (2020). WHO 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 54(24): 1451–1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.

Castellucci HI, Arezes PM, Molenbroek JFM, de Bruin R, Viviani C (2017). The influence of school furniture on students’ performance and physical responses: a systematic review. Ergonomics. 60(1): 93–110. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1170889.

De Carvalho DE, Soave D, Ross K, Callaghan JP (2010). Lumbar spine and pelvic posture between standing and sitting. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 33(1): 48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.11.008.

Dop D, Marinau CP, Padureanu V, Caragea DC, Padureanu R, Niculescu SA, et al. (2024). The impact of digital device use on body posture in children and adolescents. Biomed Rep. 21(2): 132. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1820.

Ellis Sandoval J, Tarique U, Hospital MM, Castellanos CY, Trepka MJ (2025). Smartphone use and postural changes in children and adolescents: a scoping review. Children (Basel). 12(2): 145. doi: 10.3390/children12020145.

Grabara M, Witkowska A (2024). Spinal curvatures and physical activity in school-aged children: a narrative review. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 9(1): 38. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9010038.

Hanifah L, Nasrulloh N, Sufyan DL (2023). Sedentary behavior and physical activity in school-age children in Indonesia: a national survey analysis. J Gizi Indones. 11(2): 89–97. doi: 10.14710/jgi.11.2.89-97.

Kaur J, Kumar V, Goyal M (2021). Reliability of the wall test for assessing postural deviation in children. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 15(3): 122–128. doi: 10.37506/ijpot.v15i3

Kellis E, Ellinoudis A, Intziegianni K, Kofotolis Ni (2020). Muscle Thickness During Core Stability Exercises in Children and Adults. J Hum Kinet. 71(1): 217–226. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0079.

Maciel JG, de Araújo IM, Carvalho LBC, Simao MN, Brandao CS, Navarro AM, et al. (2018). Postural changes in children and adolescents and their association with low back pain. J Pediatr (Rio J). 94(6): 591–598. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.10.011.

Mahardhika VW, Sumardiyono, Murti B, Novika RGH, Demartoto A (2026). Associations Between NonErgonomic Working Posture, Work-Related Stress, Smoking Habits, and Physical Activity with Low Back Pain among Police Personnel in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Indones J Med. 11(01): 58-69. doi:10.26911/-theijmed.2026.941.

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indo-nesia. (2017). Standar Antropometri Perabot Sekolah Dasar (Anthropo-metric standards for elementary school furniture). Jakarta: Kemenkes RI. https://keslan.kemkes.go.id/unduhan/fileunduhan_1660894423_735923.pdf.

Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 49(12): 1373–1379.

Riley RD, Snell KIE, Ensor J, Burke DL, Harrell FE, Moons KGM, et al. (2020). Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part II. Stat Med. 39(19): 2852–2869. doi: 10.1002/sim.7992.

Sedrez JA, da Rosa MIZ, Noll M, Medeiros FS, Candotti CT (2015). Risk factors associated with structural postural changes in the spinal column of children and adolescents. Rev Paul Pediatr. 33(1): 72–81. doi: 10.1016/-j.rpped.2014.11.012.

WHO (2020). WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Wiyanad A, Chokphukiao P, Suwannarat P, Thaweewannakij T, Wattanapan P, Amatachaya S (2018). Is the occiput-wall distance valid and reliable to determine the presence of thoracic hyperkyphosis? Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 38: 63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.msk-sp.2018.09.010.

Yanto Y, Lestari R, Aprianto DP (2024). The mismatch between school furniture and student anthropometry and its association with musculoskeletal complaints. J Ergon Indones. 8(1): 22–31. doi: 10.24843/joe.2024.v08.i01.p03.