The Relationship of Amount of Pleural Fluid and Time of Pleurodesis with the Results of Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusions

Authors

  • Yusup Subagio Sutanto Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine/ Universitas Sebelas Maret, Dr. Moewardi Hospital, Surakarta
  • Indarto Sigit Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine/ Universitas Sebelas Maret, Dr. Moewardi Hospital, Surakarta
  • Hendra Kurniawan Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine/ Universitas Sebelas Maret, Dr. Moewardi Hospital, Surakarta

Abstract

Background: Pleural effusion can be an early sign of lung cancer in more than 25% of cases. Lung cancer is the most common cause of ma­lignant pleural effusion (MPE). Pleuro­desis is performed when the amount of pleu­ral fluid is <150 ml/day, but it is difficult as its productive nature. This study aimed to find the right time to perform pleurodesis on patients with MPE, which is expected to achieve optimal results.

Subjects and Method: This was a cross-sec­tio­nal study conducted at Dr. Moewardi Hos­pital, Surakarta, Central Java, from June to July 2020. The study subjects were 17 pati­ents with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) diag­nos­ed with lung cancer who underwent water seal drainage (WSD) and indicated for pleurodesis. The dependent variable was the success of the pleurodesis procedure. The independent varia­bles were the amount of evacuated pleural fluid and the time of pleu­rodesis performed. The stu­dy instruments were diagnosis of lung cancer with anatomic pathology, measurement of the amount of pleural fluid, and posteroanterior chest X-ray evaluating the success of pleuro­desis. The data were analyzed using Spearman corre­lation, ANOVA to determine the differen­ces in the amount of pleural fluid at the first, second, and third hours, and continued with post hoc LSD analysis using SPSS 21.

Results: The pleurodesis success rate had posi­tive correlation with the amount of pleural fluid (r= 0.24; p= 0.345) and the time of pleu­ro­­desis performed at the first hour (r= 0.10; p= 0.701), second hour (r= 0.03; p= 0.921), and third hour (r= 0.41; p= 0.106). Pleurodesis per­form­ed at the second hour had the lowest amount of pleural fluid (Mean= 84.66; SD= 38.88), followed by third hour (Mean= 110.77; SD= 65.57), and first hour (Mean= 111.22; SD= 57.83), but the differences were not statistically significant (p= 0.285).

Conclusion: The pleurodesis success rate has a positive correlation with the amount of pleu­ral fluid and the time of pleurodesis, but it was not statistically significant. There is no signifi­cant difference in the amount of pleural fluid eva­cuated at the three different times of pleuro­desis. The least amount of pleural fluid obtains at the second hour (14.00-22.00).

Keywords: malignant pleural effusion, amou­nt of pleural fluid, pleurodesis, pleuro­desis time

Correspondence: Yusup Subagio Sutanto. Department of Pul­mo­­­no­logy and Respiratory Medicine, Fa­culty of Me­di­cine Universitas Sebelas Maret, Dr. Moewar­di Hospital, Surakarta. Jl. Kolonel Sutarto 132, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: dr_­yusupsubagio­@yahoo.com. Mobile: +628112­8­­4165.

Indonesian Journal of Medicine (2020), 05(04): 337-342
https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2020.05.04.09.

 

References

Aydin Y, Turkyilmaz A, Intepe YS, Eroglu A (2009). Malignant pleural effusions: appropriate treatment approaches. Eurasian J Med. 41(3): 186–93.

Burgers J, Kunst WA, Koolen MGJ, Will-ems A, Burgers JS, Heuvel MVD (2008). Pleural drainage and pleuro-desis: implementation of guidelines in four hospitals. Eur Respir J, 32(5): 1321–7. doi:10.1183/09031936.00165607.

El-Kolaly RM, Abo-Elnasr M, El-Guindy D (2016). Outcome of pleurodesis using different agents in management of malignant pleural effusion. Egypt J Chest Dis. 65(2): 435–40. doi: 10.10-16/j.ejcdt.2015.12.017.

Jantz MA, Antony VB (2008). Pathophysio-logy of the Pleura. Respiration. 75(2): 121–33. doi: 10.1159/000113629.

Krochmal R, Reddy C, Yarmus L, Desai NR, Kopman DF, Lee HJ (2016). Patient evaluation for rapid pleurodesis of malignant pleural effusions. J Thorac Dis. 8(9): 2538–43. doi: 10.21037/-jtd.2016.08.55.

Penz E, Watt KN, Hergott CA, Rahman NM, Psallidas I (2017). Management of malignant pleural effusion: challenges and solutions. Cancer Manag Res. 9: 229–41. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S95663.

Rafei H, Jabak S, Mina A, Tfayli A (2015). Pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions: Outcome and predictors of success. Integr Cancer Sci Ther. 2(5): 216–21. doi: 10.15761/icst.1000144.

Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ (2010). Manage-ment of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society pleural dis-ease guideline 2010. Thorax. 65(2): II32-40. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.-1369-94.

Shafiq M, Kopman DF (2015). Management of malignant pleural effusions. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 22(3): 215–25. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000-0-00000192.

Liu C, Qian Q, Geng S, Sun W, Shi Y (2015). Palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusion. Cancer Transl Med. 1(4): 131. doi: 10.4103/2395-3977.16-3804.

Yu H (2011). Management of pleural effusion, empyema, and lung abscess. Semin Intervent Radiol. 28(1): 75–86. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273942.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-27

Issue

Section

Articles