Meta-Analysis of the Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in Increasing High-Density Lipoprotein Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Authors

  • Sela Putri Adelita Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Bhisma Murti Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is one of the second biggest health problems. The Inter­natio­nal Dia­betes Feder­a­­tion said that diabetes cur­ren­­­tly affects 382 million people world­­­­­­­­­­­wide, with type 2 dia­betes mellitus (DM) being the larg­est pre­valence of 85-95% of the diabetes population. This study aimed to estimate the effect of high-inten­sity interval training (hiit) on increasing levels of high-density lipoprotein in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the results of several previous studies.

Subjects and Method: This study was a meta-analysis and systematic study, with the follow­ing PICO Population =type 2 diabetes mellitus pati­ents aged 35-65 years. Inter­­­vention=HIIT. Com­p­a­r­ison = No HIIT. Outcome = increased levels of high-density lipoprotein. The articles used in this study were obtained from several databases, inclu­d­­­­­­ing PubMed, Science­Direct, and Google Scho­lar. The key­­­­words for finding articles were: "HIIT" OR "High­­-­Intensity interval Training" OR "Dia­betes Mellitus" OR "High-­­Density Lipo­pro­tein" AND "Randomized Control­­­led Trial". The articles included in this study were full-text with a randomized controlled trial. Articles were analyz­ed by PRISMA flow chart and Re­vMan 5.3.

Results: A total of 9 articles reviewed in this meta-­analysis study originated from New York, Canada, France, Thailand, Berlin, Denmark, Aus­tralia, and the United Kingdom. Studies show­ed that high intensity interval training increased the levels of high density lipoproteins (Mean Diffe­rence= 0.01; 95% CI= 0.31 to 0.30; p= 0.970).

Conclusion: High-intensity interval training increases high-density lipoprotein levels.

Keywords: High-intensity interval training, type 2 diabetes mellitus, high-density lipoprotein

Correspondence: Sela Putri Adelita, Masters Program In Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: Sela­adelita558@gmail.com.

Indonesian Journal of Medicine (2020), 05(04): 272-281
https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2020.05.04.02.

 


 

References

American Diabetes Association (2014). Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care,37: 81–S90.

Ciolac EG, Bocchi EA, Bortolotto LA, Carva-lho VO, Greve JMD, Guimaraes GV (2010). Effects of high-intensity aerobic interval training vs. Moderate exercise on hemodynamic, metabolic and neuro-humoral abnormalities of young normotensive women at high familial risk for hypertension. Hypertension Research, 33: 836–843.

Ciolac EG, Mantuani SS, Neiva CM, Verardi C, Pessoa-Filho DM, Pimenta L (2015). Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study. J Sport and Health Sci, 32: 103–108.

Cochrane (2014). RevMan 5.3 User Guide. The Cochrane Collaboration.

Colberg SR, Albright AL, Blissmer BJ, Braun B, Chasan-Taber L, Fernhall B, Regen-steiner JG, Rubin RR, Sigal RJ (2010). Exercise and type 2 diabetes: American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement. Exercise and type 2 diabetes. Med & Sci Sports Exerc, 42: 228–230.

Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, et al. (2016). Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diab-etes Care, 39: 2065–2079.

Fisher G, Brown AW, Brown MMB, Alcorn A, Noles C, Winwood L, et al. (2015). High intensity interval- vs moderate inten-sity training for improving cardiometa-bolic health in overweight or obese males : A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 10: 1–15.

Gibala MJ, Little JP, Macdonald MJ, Hawley JA (2012). Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J Appl Physiol, 590: 1077–1084.

Goedecke J, Micklesfield L (2014). The effect of exercise on obesity, body fat distri-bution and risk for type 2 diabetes. Med & Sci Sports Exerc, 60: 82–93.

Haidich AB (2010). Metaanalysis in medical research. Hippokratia. https://doi.org-/10.5005/jp/books/10519.

Little JP, Gillen JB, Percival ME, Safdar A, Tarnopolsky MA, Punthakee Z, et al. (2011). Low-volume high-intensity interval training reduces hyperglycemia and increases muscle mitochondrial capacity in patients with type 2 dia-betes. J Appl Physiol, 111: 1554-1560.

Macleod MR, Tanriver-Ayder E, Hair K, Sena E (2019). Design of metaanalysis stu-dies. In J. E. Barrett (Ed.), Good Research Practice in Non Clinical Phar-macology and Biomedicine. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.

Mikolajewicz N, Komarova SV (2019). Meta-analytic methodology for basic rese-arch: A practical guide. Frontiers in Physiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/-fphys.2019.00203.

Mitranun W, Deerochanawong C, Tanaka H, Suksom D (2014). Continuous vs inter-val training on glycemic control and macro and microvascular reactivity in type 2 diabetic patients. Med & Sci Sports Exerc, 24: E69–E76.

Murti B (2018). Prinsip dan Metode Riset Epidemiologi (5th ed). Surakarta: Pro-gram Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masya-rakat, Program Pascasarjana, Univer-sitas Sebelas Maret.

Naesilla, Argarini R, Mukono IS (2016). Lati-han interval intensitas tinggi menurun-kan tekanan darah sistol istirahat tetapi tidak menurunkan tekanan darah diastol dan denyut nadi istirahat pada dewasa muda sehat normotensif. Med & Sci Sports Exerc, 4: 16–24.

Nikolakopoulou A, Mavridis D, Salanti G (2014). How to interpret metaanalysis models: Fixed effect and random effects metaanalyses. Evidence Based Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2014-101794.

Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, et al. (2017) Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care, 20(4): 537–544. PMID: 9096977.

Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Com-mittee (2018). Physical activity guide-lines advisory committee scientific report. Washington, DC, U.S. Depart-ment of Health and Human Services.

Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ (2010). Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 87: 4–14.

Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, metaana-lyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/-10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.

Sluik D, Buijsse B, Muckelbauer R, et al (2012). Physical activity and mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a prospective study and metaanalysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 172: 1285–1295.

Snowling NJ, & Hopkins WG (2006). Effects of different exercise training modes on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: a metaanalysis. Diabetes Care, 29: 2518–2527.

Tikkanen-Dolenc H, Waden J, Forsblom C et al (2017) FinnDiane Study Group. Physical activity reduces risk of premature mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes with and without kidney disease. Diabetes Care, 40: 1727– 1732.

Unger RH (2019) Glucagon physiology and pathophysiology. N. Engl. J. Med, 285(8). 443–449. PMID: 4997492.

Unwin NJ, Shaw J, Zimmet P, Alberti KG (2002). Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia: The cur-rent status on definition and inter-vention. Diabetic Medicine, 19: 708–723.

WHO (2016) Global Report on Diabetes. WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who. int/diabetes/publications/grd-20-16/en/. Accessed 6 April 2016.

Zhang P, Zhang X, Brown J, Vistisen D, Sicree R, Shaw J, Nichols G (2010). Global healthcare expenditure on dia-betes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., 87: 293–301.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-27

Issue

Section

Articles