Difference of Self Directed Learning Readiness Between Introvert and Extrovert Personality Type Among Medical Students

Authors

  • Nurlatifah Febriana Wijayanti Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta
  • Muhammad Eko Irawanto Masters Program of Public Health, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta
  • Bhisma Murti Masters Program of Public Health, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta

Abstract

Background: The paradigm of medical education has been changed from Teacher Centered Learning (TCL) to Student Centered Learning (SCL) that implemented through Problem-Based Learning (PBL) method. Medical students are expected to have the ability to learn independently or known as self-directed learning (SDL). This tendency then measured by a scale known as the Self Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). Perso­nality is one of the influential factors in this case. Extrovert personality type is considered mo­re suitable to the SDL method. This study aimed to determine differences in self-direct­ed learning readiness between introvert and extrovert personality type among medical stu­dents.

Subject and Methods: This was an observational analytic study with cross sectional design. The subjects were medical students at Sebelas Maret University in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. This used random sampling method. The subjects were categorized into ready and not ready for SDL. Type of personality was divided into introvert, ambivert and extrovert. Motivation was selected as a confounding variable and divided into high and low motivation. Data were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis.

Results:There were 69 students included in this study. We found that 25(36.2%) students were introvert, 16 (23.2%) students were extrovert and 28 (40.6%) students were ambivert. Based on SDLR scores, 23 (33.3%) students were ready for SDL and 46 (66.7%) students were not. Logistic regression analysis showed that extrovert students had chance to be ready for SDL 0.70 fold lower than introvert students (OR = 0.70; 95% CI= 0.18 to 2.74; p= 0.604). Otherwise, ambivert students 0.83 fold lower than introvert students (OR = 0.83; 95%CI= 0.26 to 2.64; p = 0.745) to be ready for SDL.

Conclusion: There was no statistically difference of SDLR between personality types.

Keywords: self-directed learning readiness, personality type

Correspondence: Nurlatifah Febriana Wijayanti. Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.

Indonesian Journal of Medicine (2016), 1(3):194-200
https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2017.02.01.07

References

Abd El Fattah SM (2010). Garrison's mo of self-directed learning: pre eliminary validation and relationship to academic achievement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 13(2): 586-596.

Baker DE (2012). A study Comparing selfdirected learning readiness (SDLR) in the classroom and in the clinical setting. Minneapolis, Capella University. Dissertation.

Bouncovalas M (2009). Revisiting the concept of the self in self-directed learning: Toward a more robust construct for study and practice in a global context. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 6 (1): 1-10.

Brocket RG, Hiemstra R (1991). Self direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, study, and practice. London. Routledge.

Candy PC (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Chen XS, Cheung FM, Bond MH, Leung JP (2006). Going beyond topredict self esteem, life satisfaction: The Chinese case. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 9: 24-35.

Findley BW, Bulik RJ (2011). The relationship of self directed learning readiness to knowledge based and performance based measures of success in medical students. International Journal of Self Directed Learning 8(2): 28-43.

Fisher M, King J, Tague G (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today 21: 516-525.

Furnham A, Chamorro Premuzic, Mc Dougall F (2003). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligenceas predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences 14: 49-66.

Gould K (2013). Comparing changes in knowlegde between online learning and traditional instruction in undergraduate health professsional students. Baltimore, Towson University. Dissertation.

Greveson GC, Spencer JA (2005). Self directed learning the importance of concepts and Contexts. Medical Education 39: 348-349.

Guglielmino LM (2013). The case for promoting self directed learning is formal education. SA Educ Journal 10 (2): 1-18.

Gyawali S, Jauhari AC, PR Shankar, Saha A, Ahmad M (2011). Readiness for self-directed learning among first half of students of a medical school in Nepal. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Study 5 (1): 20-23.

Hirson R (2011). Personality traits, self directed learning and career decideness of undergraduate students in large South African Metropolitan University. Johannesburg, University of Johan nesburg. Dissertation.

Klotz JC (2011). An examination of the relationship between self directed learning readiness and academic achievement in the 1st half of college students. Dissertation.

Kreber C (2006). The relationships between self-directed learning, critical thinking, and psychological type, and some implycations for teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 23(1): 71-86.

Li Y (2003). Assessment of nursing college students' learning styles in Taiwan using the Myers Briggs Type Indicator. Los Angeles, University of Southern California. Dissertation.

Mala Maung, Abas ZW, Abdullah A (2007). Factors Influencing the development of self-directed learning in a higher education environment. International Journal of Selfdirected Learning 4 (1): 27- 36.

Mifflin BM, CB Campbell dab Price DA (2000). Achieving self-directed lifelong learning in PBL curricula. Black well Science Ltd Medical Education 34: 299-306.

O'Shea E (2003). Self-directed learning in nurse education: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 43: 62-70.

Pamungkasari EP, Probandari A (2012). Measurement Capabilities Independent Learning on Students. Journal of Educational Study and Evaluation 2: 492-510.

Secondira V, Rahayu GR, Suhoyo Y (2009). Factors affecting medico Gadjah Mada University to carry out a constructive learning, independent, collaborative and contextual in problem based learning. Journal of Medical Education and Health Professions Indonesia 4: 32-45.

Song L, Hill JR (2007). A conceptual models for understanding self directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6(1): 27-41

Suryabrata (2007). Psychology of Personality. Jakarta: PT. King Grafindo Persada: 155-182; 275-315.

Sunaryo (2004). Psychology of Nursing. Jakarta: EGC.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-13

Issue

Section

Articles